RAS BiologyМикробиология Microbiology

  • ISSN (Print) 0026-3656
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5464

Degradation of the Biofilms of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria by the PAPC Serine protease from Aspergillus ochraceus

PII
10.31857/S0026365624020247-1
DOI
10.31857/S0026365624020247
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 93 / Issue number 2
Pages
228-233
Abstract
Infections associated with biofilm formation by gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms cause difficulty in therapy and are prone to transition into chronic forms. Approaches to degradation of the biofilm matrix are therefore in demand. In the present work, recombinant recombinant PAPC serine protease from Aspergillus ochraceus caused the degradation of mature biofilms formed by a number of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria by 15‒20% at 50 µg/mL. At 100 µg/mL, the biomass of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms decreased by 50%. Thus, the PAPC may be a promising agent for biofilm removal and enhance the efficiency of antimicrobial therapy.
Keywords
протеолитические ферменты бактериальные биопленки устойчивость к противомикробным препаратам разрушение биопленок
Date of publication
15.03.2024
Year of publication
2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
45

References

  1. 1. Algburi A., Comito N., Kashtanov D., Dicks L.M., Chikindas M.L. Control of biofilm formation: antibiotics and beyond // Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017. V. 83. Art. e02508-16.
  2. 2. Baidamshina D.R., Trizna E.Y., Holyavka M.G., Bogachev M.I., Artyukhov V.G., Akhatova F.S., Rozhina E.V., Fakhrullin R.F., Kayumov A.R. Targeting microbial biofilms using Ficin, a nonspecific plant protease // Sci. Rep. 2017. V. 7. Art. 46068.
  3. 3. Greer H.M., Overton K., Ferguson M.A., Spain E.M., Darling L.E., Núñez M.E., Volle C.B. Extracellular polymeric substance protects some cells in an Escherichia coli biofilm from the biomechanical consequences of treatment with magainin 2 // Microorganisms. 2021. V. 9. Art. 976.
  4. 4. Kaplan J.B. Biofilm dispersal: mechanisms, clinical implications, and potential therapeutic uses // J. Dental Res. 2010. V. 89. P. 205‒218.
  5. 5. Kaplan J.B., Mlynek K.D., Hettiarachchi H., Alamneh Y.A., Biggemann L., Zurawski D.V., Black C.C., Bane C.E., Kim R.K., Granick M.S. Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS)-degrading enzymes reduce staphylococcal surface attachment and biocide resistance on pig skin in vivo // PLoS One. 2018. V. 13. Art. e0205526.
  6. 6. Khan J., Tarar S.M., Gul I., Nawaz U., Arshad M. Challenges of antibiotic resistance biofilms and potential combating strategies: a review // 3 Biotech. 2021. V. 11. Art. 169.
  7. 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-021-02707-w
  8. 8. Khoramian B., Emaneini M., Bolourchi M., Niasari-Naslaji A., Gorganzadeh A., Abani S., Hovareshti P. Therapeutic effects of a combined antibiotic-enzyme treatment on subclinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows // Vet. Med. (Praha). 2016. V. 61. P. 237–242.
  9. 9. Komarevtsev S.K., Evseev P.V., Shneider M.M., Popova E.A., Tupikin A.E., Stepanenko V.N., Kabilov M.R., Shabunin S.V., Osmolovskiy A.A., Miroshnikov K.A. Gene analysis, cloning, and heterologous expression of protease from a micromycete Aspergillus ochraceus capable of activating protein C of blood plasma // Microorganisms. 2021. V. 9. Art. 1936.
  10. 10. Lahiri D., Nag M., Banerjee R., Mukherjee D., Garai S., Sarkar T., Dey A., Sheikh H.I., Pathak S.K., Edinur H.A., Pati S., Ray R.R. Amylases: biofilm inducer or biofilm inhibitor? // Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021. V. 11. Art. 660048.
  11. 11. Melchior M.B., Vaarkamp H., Fink-Gremmels J. Biofilms: a role in recurrent mastitis infections? // Veterinary J. 2006. V. 171. P. 398‒407.
  12. 12. O’Toole G.A., Kolter R. Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis // Mol. Microbiol. 1998. V. 28. P. 449‒461.
  13. 13. Sambrook J., Fritsch E.F., Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual // Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 1989. V. 49. № 2. P. 411.
  14. 14. Sauer K., Stoodley P., Goeres D.M., Hall-Stoodley L., Burmolle M., Stewart P.S., Bjarnsholt T. The biofilm life cycle: expanding the conceptual model of biofilm formation // Nature Revs. Microbiol. 2022. V. 20. P. 608–620.
  15. 15. Schwartz S.H. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values // Online readings in Psychology and Culture. 2012. V. 2. № 1. Art. 11.
  16. 16. Taglialegna A., Lasa I., Valle J. Amyloid structures as biofilm matrix scaffolds // J. Bacteriol. 2016. V. 198. P. 2579‒2588.
  17. 17. Usmani Y., Ahmed A., Faizi S., Versiani M.A., Shamshad S., Khan S., Simjee S.U. Antimicrobial and biofilm inhibiting potential of an amide derivative [N-(2’, 4’-dinitrophenyl)-3β-hydroxyurs-12-en-28-carbonamide] of ursolic acid by modulating membrane potential and quorum sensing against colistin resistant Acinetobacter baumannii // Microb. Pathog. 2021. V. 157. Art. 104997.
  18. 18. Vuotto C., Donelli G. Novel treatment strategies for biofilm-based infections // Drugs. 2019. V. 79. P. 1635–1655.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library